>> chris: i'm chris wallace. a wild week in washington as president trump splits with conservatives on two fronts. ♪ on trade. >> it will be 25% steel, 10% for aluminum. >> i hope the president doesn't really do this because if he does it's going to be a huge tax on american citizens. >> chris: and gun control. >> take the firearms first and then go to court. >> that's not how america works. >> chris: we will discuss the president's policies and disarray in the west wing with white house trade advisor peter navarro live on "fox news sunday" ." plus, the president's embrace of a global trade war sends the markets reeling.

josh bolten, head of the business roundtable of major american ceos joins us to sound the alarm. then, vladimir putin posts about new russian weapons he says can. we will ask our sunday panel if we are headed for a new col cold war. and our "power playerthe week,"d dolly parton on giving books to millions of children. >> there are many things that he do, this is the one that is nearest and deare ws in chris: all right now on washington. week.n donald trump's sudden changes on gunement to ie about theffs and a staff and new tariffs and the potential for a trade advisor peter navarro and josh

bolten, head of the business a p ceos. but firstocy with the latest frm the white house. >> some of president trump's ed by this week's oval office announcement of steep new tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. the commerce secretary is trying to quiet complaints. >> there's about $0.03 worth of templates deal in this canon so if it goes up 25%, that's a tiny fraction of 1 penny. >> the president has also been hearing it from governors demanding action on gun control. >> i just suggest we need a little less tweeting here, a little more listening. >> as republican leaders inched toward modest gun control measures, the president had a warning for his own party. >> some of you people are petrified of the nra. you can't be petrified. >> then he said he had a good meeting with the nra and seemed to back off with some proposals. in the west wing policy debates

continue as staffers shuffle or struggle to hold their ground. jared kushner security clearance has been downgraded. communications director hope hicks is leaving and attory pictured dining with russia probe leader rod the president d his handling of the fisa abuse >> you want to work in the trump administration, know your blood type because you will beunder t. >> officials insist this speaks dormant weeks r the nor'easter. >> i left three preschoolers and a ouse. it was pretty chaotic and certainly far more chaotic earlier this morning that when i got to theffice. >> the president took a night off from his feud with the the gridiron dinner to joke with reporters about tng headlines. for example, one presidential punch line blamed a jared kushner not being able to get through security.

cy reporting from the white house, thanks for that. the biggest policy devel this week is the president's announcement he is imposing a 25% tariff on steel imports and 10% on aluminum. joining us now, one of the architects of that controversial plan, white house trade advisor peter navarro. welcome to "fox news sunday" ." the blow back to the new tariff policy is intense, especially from conservatives,an senators. >> at the president doesn't really do this because if he does it's to -- it's just owa steel mill,uge tax on today was great for you. american family at the store tonight has something that has different metals in it, today i. >> chris: wrong? >> mr. navarro: of course they are wepublican party, let's remember

donald trump ran against 16 republicans. none of those republicans . he beat everyone of them. and then donald trump wentemocro didn't support his positions on trade and he beat them donald ts fulfill his campaign promises to the american people and the american workers. when we queued to my care about huge effects, let's do some of the numbers. first of all, realize the present is doing this because if he doesn't do this we were move that industry very quickly and our steel industry very quickly thereafter. if you look at the aluminum industry for example. we are down now to less than 10%. with lost six melter since 2013. we are down to five smelters, only two of them are fully operational. we are operating at a 43% capacity factor in only one of those smelters makes the

high-purity aluminum we need. >> chris: let's unpack some of this. one of the things that both of f those senators raised was that this is going to raise prices for american consumers, and the fact is it will. commerce secretary ross estimates that if you take the imported steel that goes into an american built car it will increase the price of that car $175. an analyst tweeted this. so, a new $175 per vehicle tax time 17 million vehicles sold in the usa in 2017 equals almost $3 billion in new annual consumer taxes, just for steel and autos. overall, if i may, if you talk about not just cars but all the products that use imported steel or imported aluminum, we are talking about a tax on american consumers in the billions of dollars. >> mr. navarro: i like

secretary ross' map of a lot better. let's do it for aluminum. if you look at a 10% tariff on aluminum, a six-pack of beer, coke, that's a scent and a half. if you look at the other end of the spectrum, one of the best airliners ever made, $330 million aircraft. we are talking but it increased and caused at the worst of $25,000. when you're talking about these massive costs or whatever is in fact, it's not. there are no downstream price effects on our industries that are significant. what we are doing her, -- >> chris: wait a minute, if it's $175 a are 17,000 -- 17 million cars, that >> mr. navarro: $175 on $35,000 car is a small fraction of 1%. >> chris: you added up.

dollars. >> mr. navarro: last time i economy. there are not zeros. >> chris: i know you are a good economist but the fact is we are talkingnsf dollars, correct? >> mr. navarro: on amy. >> chris: but you do agree. >> mr. navarro effects of steeld aluminum tariffs here is to preserve our steel and aluminum industries for national security and economic security. >> chris: i want to pick up on exactly that point because the president is imposing these new tariffs under section 232 of the trade expansion act which says that all of this imported steel and all of this imported aluminum threatens our national security. i want to ask you about that. here are the countries that we import steel from. canada is number one with 16% of the market. south korea is number three. russia is number five in china

is way down at number 11 with only 2% of our national steel imports. question, how can canadian imports be a threat to our national security when, for the last quarter-century under law canadian imports -- the canadian industrial base is considered part of our defense, the american defense industrial base? >> mr. navarro: first of all let's talk about the 2:30 two. its national security and economic sec this country -- itt ivg at the way we are we this are not going to have an teel industry industry. that thing is on that will be gone in a year or two if the president doesn't take the courageous acthas prop.

>> chris: let me ask you this, will the president -- >> mr. navarro: you asked me not to filibuster, i would ask asking the questions. will the president exempt allies like c >> mr. navarro: on thursday, which was a great meeting with the uniform consensus that what the president was tariffs, not quotas and it needed to be across-the-board. that was the president's announcement, that's the direction it's heading. my expectation is that the direction it's heading. >> chris: so in answer to my direct question, will he exempt canada? will he exempt the european union? >> mr. navarro: that's not his decision. >> chris: i mean it is his decision. you are saying he's not going to do it? >> mr. navarro: you have to understand, as soon as he starts exempt in countries he has to raise the tariff on everybody else. as soon as he exams one country his phone starts ringing from heads of state of other countries. why not make?

>> chris: a global imposition? >> mr. navarro: that's the answer. yes. as it should be. let's think about what the mission is here. the mission is to defend our steel and aluminum industries so that they survive it and as the president said clearly and correctly, we can't have a country without steel and aluminum industry. would you grant me this, that we are down now to less than 10% of production? >> chris: i'm just asking the questions, so let me ask another question. the other concern is that prices will not just go up, but that other countries will retaliate and slap tariffs on u.s. exports to their countries. president trump tweeted this on friday about responding to u.s. trade deficits with countries. trade wars are good and easy to win. and here's what you said. >> i don't believe any country

in the world is going to retaliate for the simple reason that we are the most lucrative and biggest market in the world. >> chris: do you really believe that? >> mr. navarro: yes i do. let's give it some perspective. we have the lowest tariffs in the world, the lowest nontariff barriers. we are the free-trade nation of the world. we don't get favor and reciprocal trade, we get every year a half a trillion dollar trade deficit that transfers our wealth to other countries and basically offshore as our jobs and our factories. all we are asking for -- in this particular case the defending national security, but more broadly these countries that we are trading with, they understand a very good deal for many years, all the president is doing, he's been saying this for two years now, actually for 20, that america first, we want a fair deal, we want reciprocal trade. >> chris: if i may ask a question now, that may be your

argument, but the european union for instance doesn't believe it. they say that they have already assembled a package of tariffs, 25% tariffs on three and a half billion dollars on u.s. exports, the head of the european commission said this. we will put tariffs on harley-davidson, on bourbon and on blue, levi's. question, is he bluffing? >> mr. navarro: go to india for example, 100% tariff on the harleys. >> chris: i'm asking about the european union. do you believe he is in bluffing? >> mr. navarro: what we need to do here is keep the rhetoric down. it would be helpful if the media didn't have all these crazy lines about trade wars. and look at the facts. facts are we are the biggest market in the world. >> chris: wait a minute. trade wars are good. trade wars are good is a tweet from the president, mr. navarro.

>> mr. navarro: i'm going to finish this argument. the argument is simply that -- >> chris: do you agree that trade wars are good was a tweet by the president? >> mr. navarro: all of the countries in europe that we trade with run very large trade surpluses with us, we run trade deficits with them. who gets hurt if this goes the direction that you are suggesting? i believe that the are measured tariffs. >> chris: i am not suggesting anything. i'm asking you questions and i take objection to the idea that talk of trade wars is an invention of the media when the president tweeted out trade wars are good and easy to win. i have limited time. i'm fanning the flames? i didn't write the president's tweet. >> mr. navarro: what i'm signing, trying to say in a measured weight is from the rest of the world's perspective they are getting a really good deal from america running big trade ports ophthalmic surpluses with us and all we are asking is fair

and reciprocal trade. in this particular case i would hope the alice would understand- >> chris: i have one final question for you. i think we got the point. to call you trade hard-liner is an understatement. called "death by china" that youumenta. here is the trailer for that documentary that shows a representing china going into the heart of the united states.f accuse you of guerrilla warfare, saying west wing and go into the and runaround policy meetings to personally lobbyhata number of senior staff were surprised when the presionde thursday. how do you plead? >> mr. navarro: i would say that sitting heday with you, that's a bit of a cheap shot, that support that and if i've learned anything in the 14 months here in washington on white house

it's that there's all sorts of malicious leaks that go into try to hurt us. the culture in the white house now is if they go after one of us they go after all of us. we are a team together. the president is doing a great job and i stand on my writings. i can tell you that as the china issue is one that we have the country are going to have to address because it's a serious matter. >> chris: mr. navarro, thank you, thanks for your time. please come back. a spirited discussion. up next, reaction from the head of the business roundtable on what these tariffs will mean for american jobs in the u.s. economy. ♪ fees? what did you have in mind? i don't know. $4.95 per trade? uhhh. and i was wondering if your brokerage offers some sort of guarantee? guarantee? where we can get our fees and commissions back if we're not happy. so can you offer me what schwab is offering? what's with all the questions? ask your broker if they're offering $4.95 online equity

trades and a satisfaction guarantee. if you don't like their answer, ask again at schwab.

♪ >> chris: even before the new trump tariffs are officially announced, there is purest pushed back to the policy. at some of the loudest alarms are coming from the business roundtable, an association of ceos from leading u.s. companies. joining me now, josh bolten, head of the business roundtable and former white house chief of staff under george w. bush. welcome back. >> mr. bolten: thank you. and >> chris: you are listening to mr. navarro, what you think of his defense of the new tariffs? >> mr. bolten: i think it's a huge mistake and i'm sad that president trump has been led by that kind of advice. thank you. president trump i think is

coming at this with the best of instincts. he's trying to fulfill his campaign promises. he's trying to help some workers in the united states, specifically in the steel and aluminum industries. what he needs to understand and what the overwhelming majority of the businesses in our organization are trying to say is this will cause huge damage across broad sectors of the economy. you may be will be able to give a little bit of help to the steelill cause damage across any number of downstream industries in any number of that export the countries that are like t question i think you would agree that the directly and through other countries has dramatically hurt the steel industry and co american jobs. are you saying the president should just sta let

it happen? >> mr. bolten: absolutely not. u identify, which is state subsidized overcapacity in china, especially in steel. that's the issue that ought to be addressed. ironically, the announcement that president trump made this last week hits steel imported from all kinds of countries, most of them are friends and allies. many of them are free trade agreement partners. and hits china only minimally. china accounts for only 2% of the u.s. steel imports at this point. the remedies that peter navarro is pushing the president to impose doesn't address the real problem, which is chinese overcapacity. how do you address that? is really hard. it got to get together with our friends and allies, who all face the same problem. put pressure on the chinese jointly, because you can't do this individually, and forced

the chinese to reform their practices. it's not an easy task. it's not as easy as waving your hand and putting tariffs on a whole bunch of countries that are not the problem. >> chris: let's talk about what you say are the downsides of this. mr. navarro said that the talk that this is going to increase prices for american consumers is overstated. talks about a penny on a beer can or $50 on an american car, and he also says the threat of retaliation is overstated. >> mr. bolten: dead wrong on both counts. first of all, it may be only a penny on a beverage can, but let's be clear, in the united states we make 88 billion beverage cans, aluminum beverage cans per year. that comes out to a tax of $880 million just on beverage cans. and we are talking all kinds of products when you get to cars, when you get to tractors, when

you get to airplanes, the cost is really high. making our products uncompetitive against their foreign competitors. that's number one. number two on the retaliation point, and peter navarro seems to be very comfortable that we won't get retaliated against. i hope he's right. but the history is completely against him on that and the statements of some of our trading partners already is against that. i don't know if peter navarro would be willing to bet his job that he is right that there won't be retaliation, but he ought to be willing to make that bet because he's putting the jobs of tens of thousands of americans who depend on these export markets that there won't be retaliation. and there's a lot of risk that he is wrong. >> chris: what are the chances that this escalates into a global trade war? and if so, what with the impact be not just in the u.s. economy, but the global economy?

>> mr. bolten: escalation into a trade war is what the businesses in my organization are really worried about. it's bad enough in the steel and aluminum case, but the tweets by the president, including the tweet about responding on german autos on friday suggests that he thinks a trade war is easy, that it's winnable. it isn't. nobody wins a trade war, especially in the days when we are so dependent on goods coming in and going out. competitiveness. every modern president has faced some straight skirmishes in their time, but they have all been wise enough not to let it descend into outbreak trade wars. >> chris: let me ask you about that, because you do have some experience with this, you are the deputy chief of staff first of the bush white house and into thousand two president bush,

bush 43, imposed steel tariffs of 30% on foreign steel imports. he did exempt some countries like canada, which this president according to mr. mr. navarro, is not going to do. there was some retaliation and eventually less than two years later you rescinded. you lifted the tariffs. what lesson did you take from that experience into thousand two and three? >> mr. bolten: all of the economic studies that came after that show that we lost more jobs in the downstream industries then we saved in steel. steel wouldn't be in the problem it would be today if those metrics had been effective. there's a very important difference between what president bush did and what president trump is proposing to do and it's a little bit detailed but bear with me for a second because i think it is very important. president bush and most trade remedy measures of this kind of been done under section 201, it requires going to an independent

body -- if you succeed in making a showing of serious kind of industry, the products get perry back as they did for president bush. and then internationally that's generally accepted as a way to proceed. the europeans in that case took us to the wto. when they won the case president bush immediately remove the tariffs and there was no retaliation. this is completely different. he's proposing to succeed -- >> chris: we talked about that, national security. >> mr. bolten: national security and a statue that has only been used twice in this country's history to restrain imports from iran and libya of oil. that's a real national security. in this case, even the secretary of defense doesn't think it's implicated and what that does is it frees up our trading partners to retaliate willy-nilly, which i think they will feel justified

in doing. >> chris: a couple of minutes left i want to squeeze in two questions. a number of senior staff people were surprised when the president actually announced the plan on thursday. they thought there were still discussing it. as chief of staff and the bush 43 white house, what do you waye operates? >> mr. bolten: it's a very different place. every white house has its own style. ours w partition of particularly disciplined style. the current w disciplined. i think john kelly has brought a substantial amount of coherence to the policy. to be when you findsue and other decision of this import is mad f didn't apparently knows going to happen? >> mr. bolten:

serious problem, but i don't fi here is the process. the problem here is the instinct that the president brought with he campaign and you have to respect that. strong policies. on taxes, on regulation, but the third stool of international trade on which he campaigned his week. sometimes a president needs to -- you need to stick to your principles but you also need to recognize in cases where stuff you said in the campaign isn't right and ought to be drawn back. the president needs to have the courage to do that. >> chris: thank you. thanks for coming in today. we will follow-up with the president formally announces this week. >> mr. bolten: great, thank you. >> chris: up next we will bring in our sunday group to discuss the presidency evolving position on guns and school safety and whether he can strike a deal with congress to get anything done.

>> chris: coming up, president trump's comments on guns, including whether to raise the age to buy a rifle, worry some conservatives. >> if you are afraid of the nra. >> chris: we will ask our sunday panel about the president's changing position on guns

>> half of your so afraid of the nra. there's nothing to be afraid of. and you know what? we have to fight them every once in a while, that's okay. >> chris: president from telling the nation's governors not to fear the gun lobby during a white house meeting this week. and it's time now for our sunday group, the head of heritage action for america, michael needham. gerald seib, from "the wall street journal." former democratic congresswoman jane harman, director of the woodrow wilson center. and josh holmes, mitch mcconnell's former chief of staff and now a g.o.p.

strategist. michael, how do you explain it? the president is almost haunting governors and republican members of congress in the two listening sessions this week not to be afraid of the nra, then he meets with the nra and he appears to start backing off some of the things he said in those sessions. what happened? >> i think of a president who wants to get something done. he like all of us wants to find a way to increase school safety, to make sure something like this doesn't happen again. to sum up what the president said really was unfair. you look at somebody like senator toomey and his criticism of him. i've disagreed with the senator in the past, he has somebody that has approached this issue with nothing but the utmost integrity. what makes this issue so hard for us as a country is as one of the flash points in a cultural, civic breaking apart that really does risk tearing our country. your one half of the country who literally doesn't understand why somebody would want to have a gun, doesn't understand why somebody would want to use a gun. then you have another part of the country that says every

opportunitythey have they come in they try to take away the rights of law-abiding citizens. until we can get to a pointo ch other, want to understand each other and can start finding the types of policies that will actually make a difference, we are never gog bhing the nra? >> i don't know that bashing the nra isar i think this is a president that is new to some of these issuesis of the last several decades. he's trying to get get somethin. in an area th flash point in a civic breaking apart that is one of the real threats to our democracy a to b. >> chris: in his session with members of congress, president trump seemed determined to take guns away from mentally unstabl the parkl, you're the president is. >> take so longto get the due ps

procedures. i like taking the guns early. you can know exactly what you're saying but take the guns first, go through due process second. >> chris: congresswoman, take the guns first, then go through due process second was kind of extreme i would think even for the fiercest gun-control advocates among democrats? what are the chances that for all the emotions when this thing is said and done, nothing meaningful is going to get past and congress? >> i think they are significant and it's >> chris: significant chances? >> significant chance that congress will be able to do anything. between guns and no guns, it's a debate about what level ofteionn school? how can we take mentally unstable people, didcially assault weapons. work, dianne feinstein had a bill to ban assault weapons, con lost.

people were spooked. ten years later it expired. but i do thihealth. >> chris: why do you think nothing is going to happen? >> there is no fundamentalagreed happen. even this tiny little bill about registration is stuck because some democrats want more than that and >> chris: don'tay registration. >> not a basketball team. the point is that even th stuck because one side once more, one side wants this. can't we get it thatoing to go a from now on, my grandkids are, and that's at the wrong message for kids. >> i think it's fair to say one sidencil could pass if democrats want to pass it s andp forward. senator rubio gave a great speech on the floor of the

senate w about specific pieces of legislation that have bipartisan support thatuay could have prevented this restraining orders from guns, making it easier for school officials to problems and sending them to the cops. we need to get those things done. democrat party want to work with republicans to get things done or do they want aet me just ans. democrats want to getne in piect least to me is okay, although i think we should do more. governors, fortunately, and the private sector, these gun stores are moving into the vacuum >> chris: thisan unruly white ht really did seem to veer out of control this week. screen. there were a series of leaks that seemedesshr. the president called the .ecision by attorney general

economic advisor said to be on the vergeer the issue of tariffs. in the president according to some reports nional security advisor general mcmaster out. what is going on?t it was a great week. about this. i talked to some people who work in theyoare not going to changee way president trump operates. this is the way heink it's a mio have a structure that is designed to change him. have a staff structure that it seemed to be in place for a while. but rob porter, the staff who hl things a lot is gone. general kelly, who seemed to have instilled some order, it has now found.im that has created its own chaos. some of the topalso have the issues that have been bubbling along have now come to the surface.le, what you

just had some very interesting conversations on, was alw the we staff. that was below the surface. there's no getting around that when you get to the point where that was the most amazing thing that happened this week, theuncy that he was going to impose tariffs on trade andnum imports because the staff at been telling people just an hour earlier it's happen. when you bring that sort of question to going to see the splits. you can't keep themnger. >> chris: josh, how much concern among top republicans in this town, mostlyehald me, about staff disarray in the white house? >> i think the second piece is the most important that because largely the palace has been obsessed with since day one and the administratio no different. it seems to be more of a central

thesis with this admis than other administrations. but i think the only time they care about affects the policy. i think this week is the first week and many, manyoi back to probably july of last year that it did. and we saw these trade proposal. a lot of misunderstanding about wh were in the lack of consensus internally. that is acongress reacts only ad exclusively toto to remember t5 different opinions out there, at leas every morning and see the new president of the united states, they all hav individual opinions, so they need consistency from the administration to help guide break here, but when we come back we will discussrussia has e missiles thatnses. plus, what would you like to ask or twitter,out prospects for

@fo air. ♪ you need to buy a car

and you want to e options it would be easy. but with terms like msrp, invoice, list pric you just want to get a real price only with true car can you see what other people paid for the car you want who offer prices based on this same information.do tha. from end to end, ue car is y one stop solution.

e, but no 1 wanted to speak with us constructively, no one has listened to us. you listen to >> chris: washing president vladimir putin with an ominous warning after announcing a new weapons and we are back in with the panel. as his announcement, do we think he really has these weapons and if so, how it change our relations with russia, are we headed for a new? >> let's focus on the fact that there is an election russia. vladimir putin is essentially unopposed, but it wouldn't hurt to putign speech, which he did very effectively.heelves, some of its new, some of it isn't new. a 2007 russiand, a lot of it

documentary which has been on youtubein 2011, so that's clearly not new. in tki his ability to be invincible, not so much muchr to defend against than missiles that have a parabola that goe d. >> chris: on th the animation actually showed the missile what does this say about u.s.-russian relations? than your button and all of that. we'vey and we also should worry about russia transferring technology to countries. we just learned that russia has been laundering that coal from north korea to other places. not so good. at say was there is a missile-defense rierway. we should do more with our missile-defense. they will ne russia could overwhelm us but we could overwhelm them.

as to a newk so. i think it's a very different world now. but whatap that ronald reagan had about a shining city on a hill, notush e should be, but where is the vision for america and our role in that we could do. >> chris: we asked you for roalexons for the panel and we atmore. wouldn't imposing that congress approved of near unanimously be a good deterrent? josh, how do you answer alex? >> it's a great the irony of this administration and how they've dealt with sanctions is actually fueled the greater speculation about all of election of 26. it all the investigation of the who drive through of the sanctions i think without any question they would be in at to the investigations. king.we are doing currently is you had dni director coats out.,

all saying we're not doing enough russia, particularly with respect to our ofctions and the midterms members of congress, they all 6hink that we spend far too much elections, not nearly enough talk about 2018 elections and itdress some of that. >> chris: as a matter of fact, that brings capitol hill this week were senator elizabeth warren w secu, admiral rogers. mike rogers about given what happened in modeling, what about the dangers to 2018, concern i believe that president putin has clearly coms little price to player. >> bingo. >> and that continue this activity. >> chris: has president trump been enough.

forget 2016, let's put that in the box for a minute. has he been tough enough insane vladimir putin and the kremlin nt in the 2018 elections? >> he should be very clear about that.d to protect our critical infrastructure and he should never miss an opportunity to makear how much we are committed to that. i think writ towards russia for a long time has been a little bit naive and i think writ large has been bringing it together into a very coherent they put out there that needs to be more aggressive in looking ae russian threat, recognizing that vladimir putin is not backing ad it's going to take a unified national response from ourview,m our relationship with ukraine. from our relationship with the sanctions that you bro here. i think the trump administration has done a very good job of taking our policy, unifying around themes, backing up our allies, being moreards r.

but clearly there's more that we need to do to make it clear that election modeling is n>> chris:r head, congresswoman? the trump administration has no coherent world strategy and i ainistratid either. but now is the time. vulnerable in 2018, and so areur elections. targeted sanctions that hit individuals and prevent them from traveling and pnternationas would make a huge difference in russia and i think trump missed putting out there the fortune 500 list and not doing that was a stratec blunder. to come together and say on tha this one we need to be unified. postural review, what president trump about 2018 is a president obama put out in 2010 but is not really that different of what he's doing atthe admini. i think there's more bipartisan consensus that we need to come togeissues. >> chris: there's been almost

silence from thi provocative sph by vladimir putin, the president basically said nothing. there has been no response from this >> i think there's an unfortunate reality here aut thn which has consumed this conversatihaif you could do if we suggested put it in a box and get on to thethat'. it's not happening in part of pennsylvania avenue are obsessed with what happened in 2016, but democracy is under attack and not just from russia and not in russia, europe in it happening here. both the russians and other models besides democracy is the model that other couought to follow. there's a really sustained attack on basically of democracy and its role as a model for the world. that's

that is now being basically lost as a question that ought to be obsession with 2016. i don't know how you break out of that. >> chris: lbeets cause it is no. it's on the front page of the. i think sometimes the incremental information weis sii think it's meaningless. robert mueller is a everything. what is the opportunity cost of this. obviously it has to be investigated we are a year and a third into this administration. >> i think it's obwe are talking about don't get raised, don't get discussed but atmes t. i don't know what the end point is but at some point later this year i assume itand then we wilr to some questions and maybehe questions. >> imagine just for the midterms in the state of ohio in the state of florida all of a sde

integrity of its ballots that were cast. that is a funda democracy. that's what the prices. sadly congress could act on a bipartisan basis in many immigration, obviously this ng our electiondling. infrastructure onstained basis,t do it. >> chris: thank you, pal. see you up next hour "power player of the week," dolly parton on why kids around tr the book ♪

we're here when you're ready. >> chris: most of us know her ut for millions of kids, she is the one who help them start early. here is our "power player of the week" ." >> i was thought there was magic

b can want to go. you can find it in the book. it's as dolly parton, that's my name. >> chris: the library of congress is not e parton, but ts celebrating her love of books. >> ♪ in my tennessee >> chris: it's a story that begins back when s w 1 of 12 chy mounds of east tenness daughter of robert lee parton. >> had an education. a-determiner >> chris: fast-forward to 1995 when the country to start the imaginatieeon books tn in her hometown. over t has spread across the country and ov who sign up from birth until they kindergarten. what does it mean to a child to them in their own name? feel sp. but of course it makes them want all about, learn to read it.

>> chris: local communities pay book but dolly square pays for sending out more than a million helps cover through our companies and concerts and even a children's >> millions of dollars. >> chris: it's not important to you? >> it's veryof the many things , this is the one that is nearest and dearest m heart. >> chris: dolly has been performing for morear she's won a grammy's and is in the country musicbut she shows f slowing down >> it's my gift, it's my joy, it's my job, and it's do. i never think about that i should quit it. c us back to the imagination library. i undgotten a nickname from this program. >> on the book lady. know?

>> we are so honedhundred milli- >> chris: er dolly with a library of congress donating the book, unveiling a copy of her own coat of many colors b coat a her mother made for her out of >> maybe we will be back for a billionth book. wouldn't that be nice!t mean to you, library of congress. >> here i mountain, now in my book about my mom a my dad is ge available forever in the library of congress. us a little concert about the coat and her family and what led her share her dream with so many children. that my mama made for me, that i were so proudly ♪ ♪ and although we had no

♪ i was rich as i could be manye for me ♪ because she made it just for me. >> chr treat. dolly's imaginatioliof congressy time for kids the lasteach mont. to learn more please go to website, foxnewssunday.com. to tune into your local fox station tonight at 7:00 p.m. ea billy graham, an extraordinary journey. the story of ld to rest on fri. and that's it for today. have and we will see you next "fox news sunday"

>> dr. michael youssef: of my heart, i want everyone who's watching me right now, wherever youre to know that we have two enemies, o one from without, and, a unitin, they hate each other, but they're uniting together against those who lovee lord je. now, don't get angry, because that is not but be proactive, and to do throughout this series of messages. that's what i want you to do when you read my boo is to be proactive, lovingly proactive,speaking the.